Dating ranging from sexting behaviours and associated qualities

Studies were analysed having fun with SPSS 25.0. First descriptive analyses was basically performed, plus Cronbach’s alphas and frequencies. Digital logistic regressions were utilized to assess connections anywhere between gender, age, sexual direction, which have a romantic/sexual mate, SNS used, sexting normalisation and you may willingness to take part in sexting due to the fact separate parameters, while the five sexting habits given that dependent parameters. Nagelkerke’s Roentgen dos is considered as a way of measuring feeling size. All of the variables was in fact inserted to your design concurrently. The study has also been stratified by the gender.

Frequency out of sexting habits

The most frequent sexting behaviors are getting (21.2%) and getting via a mediator (28.4%), with 3rd-group forwarding away from intimate stuff (9.3%) and you may, lastly, sending (8.1%). Descriptive analytics are provided for the Dining table 2.

This new regression designs was basically extreme. Nagelkerke’s R dos is .42 to your “sending” model, .30 towards “receiving” design, .23 towards the “third-group forwarding” model, and you may .17 with the “researching through a mediator” design (Table step three:

On the “sending” design, readiness to sext (OR: 8.26; 95% count on interval [CI]: 5.36-), which have a romantic/sexual mate (OR: step three.44; 95% CI: dos.25-5.25), using Snapchat (OR: step one.87; 95% CI: 1.19-dos.93), intimate orientation (OR: 1.77; 95% CI: step 1.04-3.00) and you will age (OR: step one.36; 95% CI: step 1.step 14-1.63) was somewhat about giving engagement. Regarding the “receiving” design, with an enchanting/sexual lover (OR: step 3.dos7; 95% CI: 2.51-cuatro.28), willingness so you’re able to sext (OR: 2.79; 95% CI: 2.01-step 3.89), playing with Instagram (OR: 1.89; 95% CI: step one.16-step 3.10), intercourse (OR: 1.82; 95% CI: step 1.37-2.41), using Snapchat (OR: 1.6step 1; 95% CI: step 1.21-dos.14), sexting normalisation (OR: 1.49; 95% CI: 1.20-step one.86) and you can years (OR: 1.26; 95% CI: 1.12-1.41) had been notably related to receiving engagement.

Regarding the “third-team forwarding” model, playing with Instagram (OR: 2.74; 95% CI: 1.1six-six.51), readiness in order to sext (OR: dos.00; 95% CI: step one.48-dos.72), sex (OR: 1.96; 95% CI: step 1.3dos-2.91), which have a romantic/intimate spouse (OR: 1.86; 95% CI: 1.dos9-2.68), playing with Myspace (OR: 1.53; 95% CI: step 1.03-dos.26), sexting normalisation (OR: step one.43; 95% CI: step 1.09-1.87) and you can decades (OR: 1.43; 95% CI: 1.22-step one.66) was indeed notably regarding engagement in third-people forwarding.

Regarding “researching thru a mediator” design, using Instagram (OR: 2.step one6; 95% CI: step 1.47-step 3.19), sexting normalisation (OR: step one.84; 95% CI: step 1.52-2.24), with a romantic/intimate companion (OR: step one.7step one; 95% CI: step one.35-dos.17), intercourse (OR: step one.4step one; 95% CI: step one.step onestep one-step one.80) and you may age (OR: step 1.36; 95% CI: 1.23-1.49) were rather connected with engagement for the choosing via a mediator.

Intercourse distinctions

The new bulgarian modelos de matrimonio regression models had been tall. Nagelkerke’s R dos try .50 for girls and you may .41 for men on “sending” model; .30 for females and you will .29 to have boys towards “receiving” model; .18 for girls and you will .24 getting guys to the “third-people forwarding” model; and you may .fourteen for girls and you will .22 having boys towards “searching via a mediator” model (Table cuatro:

In the “sending” design, for girls, readiness so you can sext (OR: ; 95% CI: -), with an intimate/intimate spouse (OR: 4.54; 95% CI: 2.27-nine.09) and you can ages (OR: 1.60; 95% CI: step 1.17-dos.20) had been rather pertaining to giving wedding. To have males, these people were desire so you’re able to sext (OR: six.05; 95% CI: step three.68-9.94), having a romantic/intimate spouse (OR: dos.79; 95% CI: step one.59-cuatro.88) and ultizing Snapchat (OR: dos.38; 95% CI: step one.32-cuatro.29).

Throughout the “receiving” design, for girls, desire so you’re able to sext (OR: 5.11; 95% CI: 2.57-), playing with Instagram (OR: 4.34; 95% CI: 1.43-), that have an intimate/intimate companion (OR: step 3.77; 95% CI: dos.49-5.72), sexting normalisation (OR: 1.62; 95% CI: step 1.13-dos.33) and ages (OR: step one.42; 95% CI: step 1.step 17-1.72) was indeed significantly pertaining to receiving engagement. Having boys, these people were having an intimate/sexual spouse (OR: 2.97; 95% CI: 2.08-4.25), determination to help you sext (OR: 2.32; 95% CI: step one.58-3.41), having fun with Snapchat (OR: dos.03; 95% CI: step 1.38-dos.91), sexting normalisation (OR: 1.40; 95% CI: 1.06-step 1.86) and you will ages (OR: 1.20; 95% CI: step one.04-step one.38).